In the midst of the highly-charged political debate over “Obama
Care” (or the Affordable Care Act, if you prefer), it is interesting/ironic to
note that the UK’s National Insurance Act of 1911 went into effect on July 15,
1912 – 100 years ago today. This measure
gave the British working classes the first contributory system of insurance against
illness and unemployment and is often regarded as one of the foundations of
modern social welfare in the United Kingdom.
Aside from the remarkable coincidence in dates, the other truly
fascinating aspect of this era in British history is its imperfect parallel with
Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society efforts in his 1965 – 1969 Presidential
term.
The
Liberal Party won a landslide victory in the election of 1906, after the
Conservative Party split over the issue of tariffs. A large segment of the Conservatives,
abandoning a century of free trade dogma, wanted protective tariffs to insulate
British merchants from the rising tide of competition from America, Germany and
others. This became a class issue, as
the poor understood that tariffs could lead to higher food prices.
It
is important to understand that “Liberal” in this sense means largely upper and
upper-middle class Britons who were for the most part dedicated to the social
status quo. The “liberals” in the modern
sense were actually the Labor party, which didn’t fully come into its own until
after World War II.
The
Liberal government’s extensive social welfare proposals were driven by David
Lloyd George (Chancellor of the Exchequer), Winston Churchill (President of the
Board of Trade) and others. Perhaps not
surprisingly, the program was controversial, and the fight with the
Conservatives reached its climax over the 1909 “Peoples Budget.” This intentionally confrontational funding
plan, described as among the most controversial in British history, systematically
raised taxes on the rich, especially the landowners, to pay for the welfare
programs (and, incidentally, naval expansion).
In the end, the budget passed and was the tool that the Liberals used to
finally break the power of the conservative House of Lords.
As
a footnote, 1906 was the last election won by the Liberal Party. That is not, however, a pro-Conservative
judgment against social reform, as the Liberal’s place was taken by the Labor Party which continues to this day to be one of the two major British political
parties.
As
noted above, there is something of a parallel with the Great Society efforts of
the mid-1960s. Note particularly the lopsided
electoral mandate for social change (although not, of course, the only election
issue in either case), followed by sweeping, class-based enactments that
fundamentally altered the social and political landscapes of each country. For a very readable account of this dramatic era
in British history, you may want to check out Barbara Tuchman’s The Proud Tower, which is an
entertaining summary of some of the major world trends and events between 1895
and 1914.
No comments:
Post a Comment